Working backwards from the scorecard: the ignored Tender strategy

Working backwards from the scorecard: the ignored Tender strategy

Most teams write Tenders forward – starting with what they want to say. The winning teams work backwards – building every answer around the buyer’s scorecard, not their own story.

The Fatal Flaw in Most Tender Responses

Ask any seasoned evaluator, and they’ll tell you the same thing: most Tender responses are written from the inside out. Businesses start by showcasing their services, outlining credentials, listing features – and only then try to retrofit it into the buyer’s question.

It feels logical. It feels complete.

But it’s fundamentally backwards.

Because Tenders aren’t about you. They’re about what the buyer needs to evaluate.

Why the Scorecard Should Be Your Starting Point

Every Tender evaluation panel has one thing in common: a scoring matrix. It might be spelled out in the documents or kept behind closed doors, but either way, your bid is being measured against a fixed set of criteria.

If your response doesn’t map clearly to that scorecard – in structure, content, and emphasis – you’re asking the evaluator to work harder than they should.

And when scoring gets competitive, even great content can lose points if it’s misaligned, buried, or off-brief.

The Strategic Shift: Write to Be Scored, Not Just Read

Here’s what high-performing bid teams do differently:

• They build a response map before a single word is written. Each section is pre-linked to a scoring criterion.
• They mirror the buyer’s language – using the same terms that appear in the brief and scorecard to make alignment unmistakable.
• They front-load evidence in high-weighted sections, knowing that a 40% response deserves 40% of your thinking time.
• They repeat strategically, reinforcing key proof points across sections to increase recall and relevance.

In short: they don’t just answer the question – they answer it in the way it’s meant to be scored.

This Is Where Good Responses Fall Short

It’s not that most responses are wrong. It’s that they’re not scorable. They’re long, well-meaning narratives that bury the strengths evaluators are looking for under paragraphs of context.

Ask yourself:

• Have you ever written a section and then checked the weighting?
• Have you ever answered a multi-part question without signposting each part clearly?
• Have you ever assumed that a capability you described elsewhere was “understood” across the whole document?

These habits aren’t just risky – they’re point-losers.

What We Do Differently at ProposalPro

At ProposalPro, we start with the scorecard. Always.

Before we write, we dissect every criterion, break down the weightings, and reverse-engineer the optimal structure. Then we layer in strategy, storytelling, and compliance – knowing that the best responses are easy to score and hard to forget.

It’s not just about being eligible. It’s about being irresistible.

Stop Writing Forward – Start Working Backwards

You don’t get points for everything you do.

You only get points for what the buyer asks for – and how clearly you give it to them.

If your team is still writing Tenders like marketing brochures, it’s time to flip the model.

Work backwards from the scorecard. Build from the buyer’s mindset. Win before they even tally the scores.

🟠 ProposalPro helps you respond like a strategist, not a supplier.

Let’s rebuild your next Tender from the page that actually counts: the one where they decide who wins.

Find out more about ProposalPro>>

▪ Services

▪ Meet The Team

Keep an eye on ProposalPro Insights and follow us on LinkedIn for more great advice on winning Grants, Tenders and bids.